Details About Human Brain
I decided to write something consistent with the human brain and its evolution. This is the reason behind this purpose. It can be called the first episode of the series. But there is a talk in the blog world - if you think of writing a series in a few episodes or premature death. So fearing it would be a 'first episode' or after writing 'forbidding' to refrain from saying national words. But in the future, the writing was a bit of a plan but I could not write a part in detail. That may be because some parts seem to be undesirable. If you think something like this, we apologize in advance. Not at all, I am not talking about writing but after finishing the writing, I feel afraid of myself. Seeing the text has taken shape as an elephant. This type of elephant size is not read by myself. The readers are also going from the possibility. Still, I did not share the writings in smaller portions together.1. My curiosity about the human brain is actually a long time. It would be wrong to say just curiosity, from my childhood, there was a humorous mysterious feeling surrounding the brain. So in 2002 when my Ph.D. was working, I had a chance to work with modeling of the human brain. This one was a great opportunity for me, the most difficult part of human being - the work on modeling the brain. It's like being overwhelmed. But as well as being overwhelmed, my spine dropped by a cold sigh of fear. It's just a matter of fear. Only me, why are human brain structures, shapes, shapes, nature, and complexity to the Bagha Bagha scientists. The brain is rarely compared to the supercomputer, it is said to be the "father of the super omputer" of the world, someone or says 'the best biological part', or compare the complexity of the universe, whose message is not possible for anyone.
not only that. The human brain sees most people in this world as 'perfect design'. Not only the righteous, who practice systematic science, who do not like to mix religion with religion too much, they also go to the human brain to get rid of the coffers; To all, the human brain is aesthetic, complex and ultimately perfect. There are no errors in this. But what's the point of being? We know that the organisms produced by evolution and its organs are not usually perfect. Knowing how evolution works, it is not difficult to understand its causes. Since natural selection is based on the existing properties only for a long time, it changes and develops, so logically many flawed properties are found in the organism. There is a place in our eyes that we have identified as a blind spot or 'blind spot'. There is a blind spot in the eyes of each of us in the eyes of one millimeter, but we can not understand it, but in that spot, our eyes turn white. There are also abnormally inactive organs such as nipple in the male. These are not useful to the body. Women's democracy has evolved in the natural way that it is sometimes used to unwantedly fertilize tube cells, cervixes, or ovaries instead of fertilized spermatozoa. This is called 'Ektopik Pregnancy'. This type of situation arises due to the excessive cavity between the Ovary and Fallopian tubes. There are distrusting genes that are not necessarily unnecessary, but harmful mutations in the human body from time to time. Our bodies do not rot for 30 years and bone decay starts, which leads to increased bone fragility, once the disease of osteoporosis emerges. These problems arise because the 'design' of evolved organisms is not perfect.
Last year, I wrote a book called 'Philosophy of Unbelief'. A chapter in the book was presented as an example of recurrent Laryngeal nerve for mammals. Interestingly, he did not take this nerve directly from the brain to the point of talking straight from a brain. When it comes out of the brain it first goes to the book. The main artery in the left side of the heart and the ligaments arriving out of the artery, and again, need to be left over. Up and then he joins the larynx on the trip. As the issue of eating rice with the back of the head, the nerve crosses more than three feet in the space of one foot. In the case of a giraffe, we can see the same thing. In that case, it is more dangerous. After reaching out of the brain, after reaching the long throat, after reaching to the chest, after reaching the long neck, the top is connected to the speech. If a good designer had to connect directly, the distance that he had to overcome, to overcome the distance of about fifteen feet more than it is to overcome the objective, aimless and blind natural choice. One more thing is understood from this example. It is a remarkable testimony to the fact that once we have gradually evolved from the fisheries ancestors, it has become a living mammal. Professor Jerry Coen has long discussed this in his book 'Why Evolution is True'. Richard Dawkins's Greatest Show on Earth book also has a detailed discussion on this. Apart from this, there are much relevant information available in the book 'Your Inner Fish' by professor Neel Subin.
Although we know many reasons and explanations of errant defects in many parts of the body, we would certainly have stopped coming to the brain. As if I thought that the brain did not come out of the way of evolution, because it was created by the hands of an impersonal entity, it is so advanced, skillful, clean, perfect, beautiful. There is no gap in the design, no defects. But really? In today's article, we will analyze the brain from an evolutionary perspective and see how much it is for the claim.
2
I had already said that there was an uncanny curiosity about the brain. As a result of that curiosity, I had to identify around thirty-five structures (model) for my research and had to be modeled. They were all absurd - cortex, corpuscles, colonized, hippocampus, thalamus, hypothalamus, insula, gyros, cadet nucleus, putamen, thalamus, substantia Niagra, ventriculus, brainstorm etc. In my previous two articles, I gave some examples of my modeling. Here also let us -
Image- Three-brain modeling; Scientists say that our thoughts, actions, movements and daily experiences are largely dependent on the proper functioning of these parts of the brain and their coordination.
How is the human brain modeled? Each one does differently. A medical student may want to model the brain-Anatomy ahead. A neurosurgeon may be expected to dominate the brain's working model. A molecular biologist may want to address the matter on the molecular scale. Another psychologist may wish to see that the overall behavior of the brain. I was in my BUET's student life and later in the life of a mechanical engineer. So, while studying bioengineering in Ph.D., modeling the brain, my modeling was mostly borrowed from a mechanical point of view. Stress-Strain Analysis by Modeling Finite Elements etc. Modeling the brain tissue as a hyperViscoolastic material and creating a non-linear mesh. And programmed to create a display engine that saw simulations.
there is no work to do with the modeling of the brain. The purpose of this article is not to burden the modeling, but rather to try to understand the brain as a whole. But to tell which to say this is the arrangement. At the time of working with the brain, I noticed a strange thing. The thing is - I was surprised to see that the brain is generally not as perfect and intelligent as it is. There are also some brains in the brain like the nervous system, which have to be rotated much more often to work. In some places, his 'design' is humorous and weaker. Its tissues are weak, neuron structure and performance weak, the action is so bad conductive that sometimes the data is lost outside, compared to the processing of a common computer, the processing efficiency of the brain is actually inefficient. Even when there is a lot of trouble in memory, often the memory starts to cheat on us when we have passed a long time. And when you do something a little, you need to have a huge 'networking'. Our brain is like a powerful monster - the lion's power of the body is actually the cost to keep our brain active.
These things had fallen into my eyes long ago. But he did not have the courage or opportunity to do so much. And besides the great veteran experts, the way 'the best of all the countries that were busy in celebrating the brain like my homeland', and the human brain was on a pure altar, as well as serving it with flowers and belugas, I thought maybe someday I would have Neither is it wrong. Several years have passed. Meanwhile, in the workplace of different types of employment, but due to the link between my previous academic work, or because of the recent writings in the liberation of evolution, the human brain always remained the center of attraction. That is why continued research on this subject. And after doing that, I saw that - I did not have anything wrong in that time. Yes, the human brain is not that fancy or perfect thing, but in many places, it remains quite an illusion of the design - it is very well understood by the big scientists about the most recent work in the human brain. Some of these well-written books also include those ideas. Of these, Professor David Linden wrote on John Hopkins University 'The Accidental Mind: How Brain Evolution Has Given Us Love, Memory, Dreams, and God; and New York University Professor Gary Marx's' Cluj' (Kluge: The Haphazard Evolution of The Human Mind Books are very significant. But before going there we need to know a little bit about our brain.
3
Let's start in a very simple way. What is the Human Brain or the human brain? The human brain is about three pounds of dense tissue. But the tissue does not say that all the tissues are the same. There is no place thick, no place thin, no groove anywhere, no place is grooveless, straightforward. But how do you know where the brain tissue? In order to know what is in the brain, then the brain will have to dissect like the Mushfiqat Butcher of Palashi Bazar.
How to dissect the brain? In simple words, you will have to cut with a bone. However, there will be no rigidity in the way, the rules of cutting are some. You actually open three paths. You can cut the brain in the horizontal, which is called the coronal section, or cuts from top to bottom - which is called the axial section, or cuts alongside. The cross-section of the brain will be shown in three different ways. I'm giving a picture for the reader before I'm overwhelmed by the fact that the matter is clear-
I'm going to choose a 'surgical cross-section' cut alongside, for convenience. If we cut through the middle of the middle, we can find some important organs. But the names of all the limbs do not need to be known at this moment, some of which can be found in this article, here are some of them.
In this section, the cortex, corpus colostomy, thalamus, herbalism, brain stem, hypothalamus, and cerebrum are very important. It is known that these names are not known, but they will become Mahabharata if they say what works exactly. And without that, the hand of my writing, it will become so dry like a dry crust that remains stale. What do the cortex, how the brainstorm, the works of Sérbellaméir or not, I do not even want to say it fairy, and the ability is limited? If someone asks for different organs, then there are many books in the market with an easy to use brain anatomy, please request them to see them. In the meantime, I am in front of my book, The book 'The Brain' by Professor Ammar al Chalabi, Martin R. Starner, and Shane Delangton. The book 'The Human Brain Book', written by Rita Carter, Susan Aldridge, Martin Page, and Steve Parker, is also excellent. Apart from this, there is good writing on this free blog too, as in the brain, in resonance mapping - it can be said about the neuroanatomy text. It is recommended that the readers go directly to the writing if you have more information about the work of different parts of the brain.
What I will do for this article is to divide the brain into three main sections - a) Surface or forebrain, b) Middle or Mid-Brain and C) Lower or Hind Brain. The upper parts of the head, such as cortex, cerebrum (see picture), etc. They are said to contain the highest level of human emotion in the brain. We know the awareness of the consciousness, the feelings of emotions, the responsibilities of family members, the ability to make decisions, the continuity of them is preserved, but at this level. If for some reason this part of the brain is damaged, then there is a major change in the person's personality. As it happened, in the case of a lucky railway worker Finnius Gaze. In 1848, he was engaged in the construction of the railway of Vermont. This worker took a bar of a heavy thick iron, which was called Tempting Rod, leaning the explosive blast. In order to equalize the land while making the railroad, it was the responsibility of the workers to take care of this work. Phineas Gage, a skilled worker, has done this many times. On that day, however, what happened on the day of Phineas Gaza, it is believed that the horror image of Hollywood will also be rated. For some reason, due to the explosion being a little more than twenty-nine, the temping rod, taken by the gauge, straightened his left jaw and pierced his eyes and took some part of the skull above the head.
Everyone thought that Gaz was killed. But after taking the hospital, weirdly Gaze gained the knowledge, and gradually healing in long-term treatment. The family members of Gage's family took away the entire time of the gage that Gaz was dead, and coffins were also arranged for him. They do not have the blame. Do you have such a skull split, eyes losing the jaw, or do you live in the heart of the patient?
But the gaze did not die. Survive How difficult is it to know how to survive Actually, the appearance of explosive gaze looks horrible but it can be seen if it is very good - Templing rod can destroy the eyes and jaws, but only on the surface of the brain - that is, the upper part of the frontal cortex cannot do much damage to the brain. Very unbelievably opening the iron-sized iron belt and the gap in the brain was out of sight. As a result, Gage could overcome death even though he was severely hit.
The page finally returned to work. But if he returns, his colleagues will notice that the phoenice gauge is no longer the previous gauge. Before the accident, Gaze was very happy, generous, sensitive to co-workers and a responsible person responsible for the activities. But after returning to work after the accident, he became a hot-tempered, intriguing, unbiased and selfish. Because of the good use of the responsibility-consciousness and colleagues, everyone's preferred people were Phoenius Gage, the gaze they started to avoid, due to the vagaries of the quarrels and the responsibility-degradation with him. Neurologists believe that Gaz's personality has changed radically because of the change in the frontal cortex of Gage. Everyone's favorite person has become a beautiful person. Frontal cortex - which is believed to have resulted in a loss of human emotion and personality, is a result of the loss. But the remaining parts of the brain - such as midbrain and hindbrain - do not cause any injury to an important part of the brain or because there is no problem in performing physiological functions.
I knew a bit about the brain or forebrain. Now let's go a little bit in the other two groups. The middle of the brain (mid-brain) or midbrain is a more primitive organ of evolutionary travel. And it is said to be the most primitive group of Hindrances, which are about half a billion years ago. The midbrain or the mid-mouth controls our well-being and listening. And controlling the organs of the Hind Brain, our movement, balance, breathing, alert etc. It is understood that these organs are older than the cortex, and they are present in almost all living beings. Everyone has to move to live, listen, listen, breathe. So if all these organs are hit by a big road, then the chances of survival are greatly reduced. If you survive, maybe the man will be paralyzed, depending on others' help.
So it turns out that the human brain was not made upright from zero. It has remained a long way in the evolutionary chart. The organs that were essential to the ancient and primitive work were created, at first, the new organs that were stacked on top of it were sitting on top. And above all, most of the time, it is stacked after the newest parts of the frontal cortex, which control human feelings and personality. So a biologist or evolutionary nervous neurologist, when he sees the brain of the mouse, he knows that it is the brain of reptiles, as well as the assembly of some extra parts. Likewise, when they look at the human brain again, they see that it is the brain of the rat, as well as the combination of new additions added later. That's why Professor Linden said in his book -
Linden truly says. Our brain has to grow on the basis of the elements left of my predecessors so that they have to grow with that limitation. Our brain was not made in a perfect design. Which ice cream have you ever seen in the ice cream shop? Have seen it surely After taking a screw vanilla, suddenly you think about taking a scoop strawberry ice cream? Another scup is added on top of a scoop. At the time of penny, I thought, putting another chuckle on top of it. Three-scup went back to work with an ice cream in his hand. But it is not. But what is the brain's relationship with this ice cream? There are relationships. According to Professor Linden, the development of the brain has evolved and the ice cream is much like that, every time new scops have been added to the evolutionary trajectory. The biological name has a malicious name.
In his book Lynden uses this iScmcone scoop analogous to countless times, his eyes have not been perfect, but rather a 'messy mess' (cobbled together mess). But he also made it clear that human-brain limitations can be understood from the point of view of evolution, not by the magic of a perfect creator. According to Professor Linden, 'Zoratali', Gary Marx calls this matter in his book as a clue. Those who are involved in engineering, especially - civil engineering or mechanics - many of them may be familiar with the term 'Cluj'. Even then, I think the word is unknown to most readers. So there are some explanations for this explanation.
4
Claus means that a very big problem is a very clumsy solution, but there is no problem in running the job. To understand this, let's recall the famous episode of Apollo 13 of 1970 - to understand the meaning of the word Cluj in the English dictionary. That year Apollo 13 started the journey to the Moon. It was America's seventh journey. But on the moon go to the middle of the middle of the great danger, its astronauts. The rocket oxygen tank was destroyed within two days of the journey. What is the result of that is terrible horrific. The levels of carbon dioxide in the spacecraft were increasingly dangerous. The crew understood that if this carbon dioxide level is not controlled very quickly, then it is likely that you will be able to swell soon. They got what they got in front of the - socks, cardboard boxes, plastic bags and dudettes - all made up and made all the fidgets. These stingy filters saved their lives, they were able to safely return to Earth. Apollo spacecraft captain Jim Lowell commented on the ground - 'yes we did not have any interesting things to see in this filter solution, but we had worked very well during the crisis'. This solution of the Apollo crew is a good example of Cluj. Trying to get rid of the dangers of getting the solution done by what is available in front of the hand.
At the end of the eighties, a series called McGuivar started on BTV, many remember. Those who were in Bangladesh at that time knew that there were not thousands of Hindi channels like today's Zaman. There was only BTV in the box of Ershad's father-in-the-box box, only the treasure was made. At that time, at the time of the procession of BSTV under the control of the military junta, he was known to BTV for this serial, in many occasions and rallies. Arrange to show this American with the American Serial. Needless to say, it was a very favorite series for teenagers like us. The Secret Agent of America used to miss different kinds of horrors in various missions, and with the help of present intelligence, they tried to get rid of the dangers of what was open in front of them. McGuire's solutions were a lot of clues!
The evolutionary work is very similar to that, so there are various types of clues created by evolution. We have repeatedly said that evolution has to work with the existing materials left by the predecessors, and there may be different design errors. Hold our spine. This backbone of one column is a very uncompromising solution to hold our head and body weight. That is why we often see our backlit or back pain while carrying our body weight. Many people who work more in the front of the computer, or who carry heavy loads, many of them understand the bone. But if we had a three-column spine in place of one column, we could easily avoid this unwanted back pain. Actually, if an engineer was given the responsibility of designing such an instrument, he would never have placed so much weight and body weight on one column. But unfortunately, evolution did not make it, he had to rely on the structure of a single spinal column left by our fisheries predecessors. He had to make as many people as possible to replace them. So for the fish, there is no reason for back bath, but it is for the people. It is nothing but natural clues. And the Cluj national solution never guarantees perfect design.
In fact, there is no evolution in the field of perfect or 'elegant' creation, if it does not survive due to twitching or problems, then that feature holds it and spreads it. And if there is a problem in the patchwork, then it is cut down to natural selection. Gene mutation, The evolutionary work is very similar to that, so there are various types of clues created by evolution. We have repeatedly said that evolution has to work with the existing materials left by the predecessors, and there may be different design errors. Hold our spine. This backbone of one column is a very uncompromising solution to hold our head and body weight. That is why we often see our backlit or back pain while carrying our body weight. Many people who work more in the front of the computer, or who carry heavy loads, many of them understand the bone. But if we had a three-column spine in place of one column, we could easily avoid this unwanted back pain. Actually, if an engineer was given the responsibility of designing such an instrument, he would never have placed so much weight and body weight on one column. But unfortunately, evolution did not make it, he had to rely on the structure of a single spinal column left by our fisheries predecessors. He had to make as many people as possible replace them. So for the fish, there is no reason for back bath, but it is for the people. It is nothing but natural clues. And the Cluj national solution never guarantees perfect design.
In fact, there is no evolution in the field of perfect or 'elegant' creation, if it does not survive due to twitching or problems, then that feature holds it and spreads it. And if there is a problem in the patchwork, then it is cut down to natural selection. Gene mutation, chromosome mutation; If genetic recombination, genetic drift with genetic tests of nature results from the results, it can be carried out in the population as a result, and if the results of the test result, it will be lost from the population. In this evolutionary observation, there is nothing that comes out of aesthetic at some time, but it should be kept in mind that the aesthetic did not play the role of making something, but the solutions of evolution were limited in many ways, not just above the error but in many ways. Our brain is no exception.
Talking about the limitations of the brain, neurons are the first to come. Scientists believe that the existence of the first neuron was found 60 million years ago in a type of jellyfish named Cnidaria. The interesting thing is that millions of years later human species came, but there was no change in neuron structural changes. It is not that the jellyfish neurons have become something of a 'super neuron' type in human species. Rather, to tell the truth - the basic primordial neurons of the jellyfish have to be used irreversibly to drive the human brain. Modern equipment is made using primitive accessories, and what is the key - the overbearing system is created. Give an example from everyday life. Those who live in a very old home - that is, at least twenty-five years ago, living in a house are often in a difficult situation. After repairing something, the old parts cannot be found, because in some years the technology has changed. The process of pulling power lines, plugs, sockets, bathroom shower designs do not have much to do with old methods. For small things, you can buy an iPhone or iPod by putting an old cassette player, but the whole house cannot be dropped as it is. The result that we have to accept - is the patchwork. We take the solution that we think will work best to give this patchwork. That's exactly what happened to the brain. He had to use primordial rheumatic jellyfish neurons. Lynden's language is very inefficient in neurons - 'slow, leaky and unreliable'. Neurons are connected with a biopharmaceutical called Axon. The way the copper wires carry electrical signals in our home appliances, human brains do the same thing. But by the slow pace, inefficiently. Electric signals can fluctuate around the velocity of light through a copper wire, very accurately - about 669 million miles per hour in speed. In comparison to that, the signal can be broken through the action of the engine, it is about 2.5 miles per second. That means, in order to signal to signal, the action is about 2.5 million times faster than the copper-carrying capacity. On the death of him, the signals of the ditch are carried out by the conductive crew. Of course, there are reasons. Our brain stays in a kind of saline fluid named cerebrospinal fluid. When information is transmitted through a conduction through the saline liquid, information is wasted. Know the scientists from the time of Lord Kelvin (1824-1907). Kelvin had an estimate of transmitting telegraphic information through the Atlantic Ocean, that it could not be possible to transfer information to thousands of miles away from the Atlantic Ocean without dragging it. In the saline water, the data will be dissipated (that is why a type of booster amplifier is used in a few submarines-cables, to strengthen the signal). Similar cases occur in the brain. Sometimes, when information is passed through the action, information is lost in the serial fluid saline fluid, the signal becomes weak. To cope with this weakness, the brain has to create something like an amplifier. There is a desire to write about it in the next phase. For the time being, there are some limitations in this episode. We compare branches with computers in a very big way, whereas the central processing unit of a normal desktop computer can complete 10 billion operations per second. There is a neuron's signal limit of just about 400 spikes per second to 1200 spikes per second. Not only this, monitoring of neurotransmitters in the brain has found that these are very inefficient 'probabilistic devices', able to look at their targets successfully in only 30 percent of cases. The rest of the time they are lost behind the oblivion. Professor Gary Lynch and Richard Granger joked in their book 'Big Brain', - "If a designer of Intel designed a processor chip in this way, then he would have been fired from the company!" '. That is why it can be said that the brain is not very much as an electrical device.
But when you say 'nothing to the position', it will not be so, we have to say how this unskilled machine works so well. Not only is it working, but we all are going to eat wheezing. Surely there is no explanation behind this? Actually, neurons are very inefficient because they are less in numbers than we can expect from them. But the brain has solved that problem a little bit out of the way. Increasingly multiply themselves. We did not learn that the child that we were taught to work in harmony, but neurons have learned it right. They can make the impossible by doing 'Ten Millie Work'. Yes, even if there is a structural difference between the neurons of the jellyfish, numerical differences are many. Jellyfish do not have more than 100 neurons, only a few complex creatures, such as the worm, have only three hundred neurons. And man's head? About 100 billion neurons Each of these 100 billion neurons has 5000 junctions, which we call synapses. Then how many synopsis joints will be created in one hundred billion neurons? With 100 billion, we get 5000 times that is - 500, 000, 000, 000, 000 or 500 trillion. If you start counting every second, then after completing all of your calculations, you will be able to cross one and a half million years.
Understand that there must have been a huge sacrifice to make a human brain functioning properly. The whole ten thousand, or not thousands, almost 100 billion neurons and five hundred trillions of synopsis have been arranged to cope with the situation. As a result, our brain has become extraordinarily large. Most of the energy is spent in the brain to drive the brain, and the percentage of the body goes to the power of the 'Pumpkin-Potash' The brain is not only energy-efficient, but it is also a genuine gene-again. The head of most genes in our body is booming. The number of genes in our body is not like twenty-three thousand, a feeling is not much more than an idiot worn. But there are differences in genetic boom or expression. Almost all the genetic boom bursts out on the head, which, in turn, controls the incredible large network of five hundred trillion circuits. It's like a cannabis to kill mosquitoes. They probably would not have taken anything if the neurons were not so indecipherable.
A big head problem did not only create large networks but also created anatomical problems. Perhaps for the birth of a big-headed child, the girls' body was not ready as it was. In the human species, the evolution of the brain was evident in an incredible time, and with it, the bodies of women could not be magnified in different organs such as the uterus, vagina, etc.. Thus, in the course of history, many women had to die after giving birth. In fact, after the discovery of various modern defense surgeries, including cesarean-operation, the death of the mother was more alarming as the baby was born. No other member of the species of animals has died due to childbirth. It is undoubtedly a great design of the body, a 'design-past error'. Due to the design and planning of a perfect designer, it was not perfect, as it did not make any design, planning, and clues, but there are many impressions of cloaks, and evolutionary patchwork. But there are some benefits of large brains. It is possible to work together in a parallel way because the human brain is larger and more trillion neurons. This is undoubtedly a great quality that separates the human brain from the computer. On any computer of today, there is only one 'central processing unit', which we call the CPU, on the other hand, the vast combination of many processors of the brain. In parallel, everyone works in concert to be able to overtake all the limitations of our computers. Yes - Maybe our brain may not compete with the machine in order to make bigger addition, subtraction, quality multiplication and simultaneous simulation, but it can be easily overcome by the ability of emotion, feeling, thinking, creativity, creation skills, One image Regardless of the skill of computer counting, face detection and 'visual recognition' are far behind than the human brain. When we look at the picture of Mona Lisa, our brain cells begin to flow simultaneously with continuous stimulation of many neurons; In the meanwhile, we understand that the famous art of Leonardo da Vinci - the mysterious Mona Lisa. Not only known artifacts, the familiar face of the person, the rose flower, from the chair to the small part of our pet dog appears only when we have the incredible power of our brain, but it takes computers time to do so much. In fact, compared with computers, there is a difference in computer work with the brain. The difference in a bigger place is - the contradiction of 'learn versus programming'. We grow up learning from every child every moment, from the past mistakes, we can determine the destination of the future very successfully. The computer does not learn anything. The computer depends on the programming, ie, the information already contained in it. So every time you turn on the computer, it will appear in the same fashion as you, the human brain is not the same.
That is why the human brain is much more flexible than the computer. This flexibility has made us more creative. But there is nothing to be so happy about it; It has come again as a kind of shadow for us. We do not abuse the stupid computer, we know the computer's 'memory' is perfect. Our brain's memory is as fragile as it is. Many of us do not find the car keys while going to the office, we do not find the wallet in the pants pocket, often losing the glasses. I can not remember the friend's phone number while working, forgetting the birthday of a loved one. I once parked the car at Atlanta South Terminal and left for work for three days. I came back and could not remember what I parked at the South Terminal or on the North Terminal It took a while for hours to find a car. A study published in Newsweek shows that people spend about 55 minutes in an average of day to find out the known things. Another study found that in less than 6% of cases, Skylanders died and forgot to open Parasut's Ripper.
Even worse, the memory is cheating with us. The most obvious thing - that we never forget - - over time it keeps on growing like a thick layer of dust. After a year, when we try to remember the incident, many times it gets messy, the whole incident gets up in front of us. The source of the incident goes away, the lost side-pieces may change, etc. Scientists like Elizabeth Loftus, Ira Hyman, Elke Geraerts, 'False Memory' (in the language of psychology) have shown in their studies about how people are misconstrued by mischief and memories Many times think. Even when we do not even think about it, we sometimes think it is true, our 'innovative power' and 'creativity' are sacrificial. That is why when we recite memories, they are not replayed by pressing any type of 'replay' button, it is a kind of 'recession' or reconstruction. Often the memories are shrouded in making this reconstruction. But it is not on the computer. When a document is stored on the computer when you open it by pressing the computer button, the same document will open every time, there will be no mistake, or you will not have any fraud with it. Every time you expect the same result in 'Replay' and that replay is perfect in almost 100 percent cases.
Another big problem is that when our brain collects information through the senses, it often becomes harmonious with the places of emotions. Scientists have found that with the help of parts of the brain, we analyze the information from outside the world - such as the spiritual cortex, the auditory cortex, the thalamus, amigdala etc. - they are also a source of fear in the brain, the thrill, and emotional control. At one time when people were in the forest in forests, when they saw a snake or some toxic organisms or insects, they would have been afraid to escape or to defend themselves. To create the fear of this, amigdala, visual cortex and many places could be excited. Scientists have found that in the modern age when reading computer articles or watching videos, they are dependent on different uses of that primitive organ. There are some good aspects to it, there are some bad aspects, and there are some bad sides. Think of it - whether we lose keys or glasses, or friends' feet. Another big problem is that when our brain collects information through the senses, it often becomes harmonious with the places of emotions. Scientists have found that with the help of parts of the brain, we analyze the information from outside the world - such as the spiritual cortex, the auditory cortex, the thalamus, amygdala etc. - they are also a source of fear in the brain, the thrill, and emotional control. At one time when people were in the forest in forests, when they saw a snake or some toxic organisms or insects, they would have been afraid to escape or to defend themselves. To create the fear of this, amygdala, visual cortex and many places could be excited. Scientists have found that in the modern age when reading computer articles or watching videos, they are dependent on different uses of that primitive organ. There are some good aspects to it, there are some bad aspects, and there are some bad sides. Think about - Even if we lost the keys or the glasses, or the friend's phone number, address or yesterday did not remember how to have breakfast, we can remember many things related to emotional events very well. I can still remember every incident of my grandfather that day died. I can remember all the events of the day that my father had a bypass surgery. What did the parents say before breakfast, starting from the morning, how did the taxi to be taken to the hospital, before entering the operation theater - all things She is almost a day from today to twenty years ago, but I do not have any difficulty in remembering that day. The reason is that it has a close relationship with my emotions. This matter is not only in the personal level but also in larger areas. I've talked with my American colleagues - almost everyone remembered it on September 11, 2001. They can think of that memorable day as a picture, where they were at that time, how they heard the news of twister was breaking, how they talked with colleagues, friends, relatives, and anxiety about themselves and the family - they have a detailed description of them. Can anyone ask? Our memories are not emotionally-free, like computer memory, but are closely related to emotions.And there is some problem in the memory of emotions. There is a problem to differentiate the emotion with reasoning. Although people are considered as 'the best creatures of creation', 'intelligent species', but most people can not separate their argument from religion, superstition, false beliefs, but surrender to various kinds of false beliefs, insults, and castes. Someone or someone becomes a drug addict. This happens because we are often subjected to our emotional brain control. It is not only in the religion of believers that this happens. This can happen only in the case of religious, unrighteous, religious, religious, orthodox, and progressive people. It is better understood in terms of political thought. Whoever supports the Awami League, if he has given thousands of Awami League guilt, also say that the latter is better than all BNP. Who supports the BNP, he will say again, if BNP wants to save the country from being a tail of India, BNP is the only hope. If the BNP Jamaat-e-Islami dominates the news of 'Naya-Diganta', 'Sangram', then the Awami League might give priority to Janakantha like newspapers. In the United States, Liberals see CNN and NBC as the favorite of the Conservatives, Fox News Channel. He who likes to eat cigarettes will be told about the misfortune of smoking cigarettes, but he will not enter his head, but say, 'Hey, if he does not eat a couple of cigarettes!' Whoever believes in astrology, he will remember only those events of that day He thinks 'he has gone', and forgot what he did not match immediately. Gary Marx showed in his book, the way in which our brain has evolved, the 'confirmation bias' remains the 'clue' of the ingredients of recognition. That is why, if someone is in our favorite list, we can not often see his malfunction very much, do not criticize his ideas too much. Yes, it sounds like nepotism - it's called 'halo effect' in psychology, on the contrary, if someone dislikes us or if one does not meet the ideals of our ideals, we will ruin its fourteen years. It's called 'pitchfork effect'. There is no need to go too far, looking at our blogs will find the authenticity of these different effects.
So what did the conclusion of this article stand? It is said that the brain, like other organs of the human body, is also a descendant of evolution, so its parts are not above error, but rather a kind of clue. Scientists have found that the human brain has not been made by reducing the old structures, so modern materials on the ancient organs are being stacked. That's why our brain has two sophisticated mechanisms - one new old one. Because of the use of primordial jellyfish neurons, in the same way, they are inefficient, they need a huge volume network to make them functioning properly. In order to contain this huge volume network, our brain is not going to be big, it is again one of the reasons for the death of mothers when giving birth. Our memory is not perfect, it is very fragile. Memory tricks us, we are attacked by false beliefs, we are attacked by 'Confirmation Bias' or by nepotism or 'hello effect'. We smoke because we know harmful to the body, some become addicted to the dragon. Even if the drug that is excluded, I am lazy to eat oil fat, knowing it is bad for the body. If we do not get any help from our genetics, we sit in front of the TV for hours, see the meaningless comedy, or become addicted to pornography. Claus, Claus, Clue! The brain is not made of the perfect design, but the evolutionary 'clujian' crop is not aimed at. By Copy Paste
No comments :
Post a Comment